June 14, 2026
Sussex, WI Water Quality Report 2026
Unlock the full breakdown — detected levels vs. legal limits, plus what removes each one.
Full contaminant breakdown
EPA Six-Year Review compliance monitoring, 2012–2019 — the most recent national compliance dataset EPA has published. See the sections above for more recent violation and PFAS records.
| Contaminant | Avg. detected | Highest sample | Federal limit | Avg. vs. limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radium (combined)EPA health goal: zero | 5.65 pCi/L | 10.8 pCi/L | 5 pCi/L | 113% — above |
| Gross alpha radioactivityEPA health goal: zero | 9.95 pCi/L | 32.1 pCi/L | 15 pCi/L | 66% |
| DEHP (phthalate)EPA health goal: zero | 1.85 ppb | 2.2 ppb | 6 ppb | 31% |
| Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)EPA health goal: zero | 1.31 ppb | 1.9 ppb | 5 ppb | 26% |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) | 13.7 ppb | 37.3 ppb | 80 ppb | 17% |
| Antimony | 0.72 ppb | 0.72 ppb | 6 ppb | 12% |
| ArsenicEPA health goal: zero | 1.23 ppb | 1.3 ppb | 10 ppb | 12% |
| LeadEPA health goal: zero | 1.58 ppb | 22 ppb | 15 ppb (action level) | 11% |
| Fluoride | 398 ppb | 490 ppb | 4000 ppb | 10% |
| Copper | 83.6 ppb | 410 ppb | 1300 ppb (action level) | 6% |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | 2.28 ppb | 5.86 ppb | 60 ppb | 4% |
| Barium | 51.6 ppb | 94 ppb | 2000 ppb | 3% |
| UraniumEPA health goal: zero | 0.543 ppb | 4.05 ppb | 30 ppb | 2% |
| Nitrate | 125 ppb | 180 ppb | 10000 ppb | 1% |
| Nitrate + nitrite | 115 ppb | 120 ppb | 10000 ppb | 1% |
Also tested, no detections: 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,2-Dichloropropane, 2,4,5-TP (Silvex), 2,4-D, Alachlor, Atrazine, Benzene, Beryllium, Cadmium, Carbofuran, Carbon tetrachloride, Chlordane, Chlorobenzene, Chromium (total), DEHA (adipate), Dalapon, Dichloromethane, Dinoseb, Diquat, Endothall, Endrin, Ethylbenzene, Glyphosate, Heptachlor, Heptachlor epoxide, Hexachlorobenzene, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, Lindane, Mercury (inorganic), Methoxychlor, Nitrite, Oxamyl, PCBs, Pentachlorophenol, Picloram, Selenium, Simazine, Styrene, Thallium, Toluene, Toxaphene, Trichloroethylene (TCE), Vinyl chloride, Xylenes (total), cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, o-Dichlorobenzene, p-Dichlorobenzene, trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene.
Reverse osmosis (drinking water)
The treatment category most often matched to dissolved contaminants like lead, arsenic, nitrate, fluoride, and radiological contaminants detected in this system.
Shop reverse osmosis →Whole-house carbon filtration
The treatment category most often matched to disinfection byproducts (TTHMs, haloacetic acids), chlorine taste and odor, and organic compounds detected in this system.
Shop whole-house systems →Source: U.S. EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data (2012–2019), the most recent nationwide compliance dataset EPA has released, reported at the water-system level. A detection is not a violation. “Avg. vs. limit” compares the average of laboratory detections to the federal MCL or action level; individual faucets can differ — household plumbing affects lead and copper, and a state-certified laboratory test of your own tap is the only way to confirm levels in your home. Treatment categories are general matches, not a certification claim for a specific product and contaminant.
Water Utility: Sussex Village Hall & Water Utility
Population Served: 11,750 residents
Data Sources: EPA SDWIS + EPA UCMR5
Report Year: 2026
Sussex, Wisconsin drinking water is supplied by Sussex Village Hall & Water Utility. All US public water systems must test drinking water and report results to the EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act. This report summarizes health-based violations and PFAS detections recorded in federal databases to help you make informed decisions about home water filtration.
EPA Health-Based Violation History
The following contaminants exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) at this utility since 2010:
| Contaminant | Violation Years | Filter Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2012-2019 | Whole House Filters |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2018-2019 | Water Filters |
Source: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), updated quarterly. Health-based violations only.
Should You Filter Your Sussex Water?
Even utilities with no EPA violations may have contaminants present below legal limits but above health guidelines. The EPA sets maximum contaminant levels based on what is feasible and affordable to treat at scale -- not necessarily what carries zero health risk. Many independent health organizations recommend filtration for households with children, pregnant women, or immunocompromised individuals regardless of utility compliance status.
Protect Your Sussex Home Water
PureWaterGuys.com carries filtration systems engineered to address the most common contaminants in US tap water. We ship to all Wisconsin addresses with free expert guidance on the right system.
Shop Water Filtration Systems →Take the Water QuizFrequently Asked Questions
Is Sussex tap water safe to drink?
Sussex Village Hall & Water Utility is required to meet EPA federal drinking water standards. However, meeting legal standards is not the same as being contaminant-free. Trace levels of disinfection byproducts, PFAS compounds, and other regulated contaminants are common in US municipal water systems.
Does Sussex water have PFAS?
PFAS monitoring data for this utility may not yet be published in EPA databases. We recommend a reverse osmosis system for maximum protection regardless of local results.
What water filter works best for Sussex?
A whole-house carbon block filter removes chlorine, chloramines, and many VOCs. For PFAS, arsenic, and nitrates, a reverse osmosis under-sink system provides the highest reduction rates. Take our free 2-minute quiz to find the right system for your home and budget.
Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 federal databases. PureWaterGuys.com is not affiliated with any municipal water utility. Contact your utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) for complete local data.